Stats without Tears
Solutions for Chapter 7
Updated 1 Jan 2016
(What’s New?)
Copyright © 2013–2023 by Stan Brown, BrownMath.com
View or
Print:
These pages change
automatically for your screen or printer.
Underlined text, printed
URLs, and the table of contents become live links on screen;
and you can use your browser’s commands to change the size of
the text or search for key words.
If you print, I suggest black-and-white,
two-sided printing.
← Exercises for Ch 7
1
- On any given trip, there’s a 9% chance that Chantal’s commute will be less than 17 minutes.
- 9% of Chantal’s commutes are shorter than 17 minutes.
2

P(x ≥ 76.5) =
normalcdf(76.5, 10^99, 69.3, 2.92) = .0068362782.
Here are the two interpretations,
from
Interpreting Probability
Statements in Chapter 5:
- The probability that a randomly selected man is 76.5″ or taller is 0.0068
or 0.68%.
- Only 0.68% of men are 76.5″ tall or taller.
3

“Have boundaries, find probability.”
P(64 ≤ x ≤ 67) =
normalcdf(64, 67, 64.1, 2.75) = 0.3686871988 →
0.3687
36.87% of women are 64″ to 67″ tall.
4

5% probability in the two tails means 2.5% or 0.025 in each tail.
x1 = invNorm(.025, 69.3, 2.92) =
63.57690516
x2 = invNorm(1−.025, 69.3, 2.92) =
75.02309484
Heights under 63.6″ or over 75.0″ would be considered unusual.
5

The area to left is given as 15% or 0.15, and you need the boundary.
P15 = invNorm(.15, 69.3, 2.92) = 66.27361453
You must be at least 66″ or 5′6″ tall.
Also acceptable: at least 66¼ inches, or at least 66.3
inches.
6

(a) By the definition of percentile, the number of the desired percentile is also the area to left.
P25 = invNorm(.25, 64.1, 2.75) =
62.24515319 →
P25 = 62.2″
P75 = invNorm(.75, 64.1, 2.75) =
65.95484681 →
P75 = 66.0″
(b) Q3 is P75 and Q1 is P25, so the IQR is P75−P25 =
65.95484681−62.24515319 =
3.70969362 →
IQR = 3.7″.
(c) 1.35σ = 1.35×2.75 =
3.7125 →
3.7″, matching the IQR as expected. (The match
isn’t perfect, because 1.35 is a rounded number.)
7

Use
MATH200A Program part 4. The screens are shown at right. The points fall
reasonably close to a line. r = 0.9595 and
crit = 0.9383.
r > crit, and therefore you can say that the
normal model is a good fit to the data.
8

The percentile is the percent of the population that scored ≤735.
P(x ≤ 735) = normalcdf(−10^99, 735, 500, 100) = 0.9906.
A score of 735 is at the 99th percentile.
9

2% or 0.02 is area to right, but invNorm needs area to left, so you
subtract from 1.
x1 = invNorm(1−.02, 1500, 300) = 2116.124673
You must score at least 2117. (If you round to 2116, you
get a number that is a bit less than the computed minimum. While
rounding usually makes sense, there are situations where you have to
round up, or round down, instead of following the usual rule.)
10

z
0.01 = invNorm(1−0.01, 0, 1) = 2.326347877 →
z0.01 = 2.33
11
P(x < 60) =
normalcdf(−10^99, 60, 69.3, 2.92) = 7.240062385E−4
P(x < 60) =
7.24×10-4 or (better) 0.0007
Common mistake:
The probability is
not 7.24! That’s not just wrong,
it’s very wrong — probabilities are
never greater than 1. “E−4” on your
calculator comes at the end of the number, but it’s
critical info. It means “times
10 to the minus 4th power”, so the probability is
7×10−4 or 0.0007.
- The probability that a randomly selected man is under 60″ tall is 0.0007 or 0.07%.
- 0.07% of men are under 60″ tall.
12

The plot is pretty clearly
not a straight
line — there’s a sharp bend around the second and
third data points. The numbers confirm this: r = .8363,
crit = .9121,
r < crit, and therefore the normal model
is not a good fit for this data set.
13
The middle 90% leaves 10% in the two tails, or 5% in each tail.

xm1 = invNorm(.05, 69.3, 2.92) = 64.49702741
xm2 = invNorm(1−.05, 69.3, 2.92) = 74.10297259
xf1 = invNorm(.05, 64.1, 2.75) = 59.57665253
xf2 = invNorm(1−.05, 64.1, 2.75) = 68.62334747
Men must be 64.5 to 74.1 inches tall; women must be 59.6 to 68.6 inches tall.
What’s New?
- 1 Jan 2016: Remake screen shots
here and
here, for the new version of
MATH200A Program part 4.
- 13 Mar 2015: Correct the
sketch for the problem about
percentiles of women’s heights, thanks to Jillian
Rodriguez.
- 1 Oct 2014: Clarify this
calculation.
- 27 May 2014: Supply sketches for all ten problems of finding
probabilities or boundaries.
- (intervening changes suppressed)
- 19 June 2013: New document.